Specialization

I started reading The Sea Wolf by Jack London and was struck on just the second page by a quote on specialization. Even over one hundred years ago he was remarking upon how specialization allows us the time to pursue our own specializations instead of having to constantly focus on obtaining the bare necessities for survival. Of course once you stop to think about it, there have been different specializations for millenia, but the explosive growth of technology in the past century has resulted in many sub-specializations or increasing numbers of specializations within what were previously considered specializations in their own right.

I remember thinking how comfortable it was, this division of labor which made it unnecessary for me to study fogs, winds, tides, and navigation in order to visit my friend who lived across an arm of the sea. It was good that men should be specialists, I mused. The peculiar knowledge of the pilot and captain sufficed for many thousands of people who knew no more of the sea and navigation than I knew. On the other hand, instead of having to devote my energy to the learning of a multitude of things, I concentrated it upon a few particular things, such as, for instance, the analysis of Poe’s place in American literature–an essay of mine, by the way, in the current Atlantic. Coming aboard, as I passed through the cabin, I had noticed with greedy eyes a stout gentleman reading the Atlantic, which was open at my very essay. And there it was again, the division of labor, the special knowledge of the pilot and the captain which permitted the stout gentleman to read my special knowledge on Poe while they carried him safely from Sausalito to San Francisco.

By having a specialization we free others to pursue their own specialization and advance the rate of human progress, by reducing the amount of general knowledge each of us must acquire in order to succeed within our given niche. Now it’s important to define what is meant by general knowledge, it consists of both what is generally taught in school, such as history, as well as the knowledge we acquire outside of school through society and the media. Once we have attained this basis we tend to then focus solely upon digging further into our niche and stop, or at least greatly slow building of this general store of knowledge. Which reminded of a quote from Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance by Robert M. Pirsig regarding the problem that specialization poses, especially for one seeking to switch or explore other specializations.

It’s a problem of our time. The range of human knowledge today is so great that we’re all specialists and the distance between specializations has become so great that anyone who seeks to wander freely among them almost has to forego closeness with the people around him.

Once one has selected their specialization and built up a store of knowledge about it, it becomes quite difficult to change specializations without expending a great amount of effort to learn everything that is required to be considered a specialist within the new specialization. If choosing to make this type of change though, this is where a broad general base of knowledge shows its true value, providing a strong root from which to branch off into the new specialization, or just to start exploring another area of interest. I was also reminded of what Pirsig had to say on the reason for growing one’s root of knowledge.

I’ve heard it said that the only real learning results from hang-ups, where instead of expanding the branches of what you already know, you have to stop and drift laterally for a while until you come across something that allows you to expand the roots of what you already know.

Once you have attained enough knowledge to be considered a specialist there is relatively little left to learn within that particular branch. Once we know enough to be proficient at our particular task we tend to stop learning for the most part, as there is nothing left to need to know to perform the task sufficiently. Thus to truly learn something new, we must look outside the branch of our specialization. It is this study outside of our particular discipline that can have the most profound effects on our everyday existence, as we come across new ways of thinking about or doing something we thought we already knew.

One benefit of having a broad base of knowledge is that it allows us to more easily communicate with and relate to others, the more you know, the more you can draw upon to find common ground with someone else, especially when meeting new people.

In this age of smaller and smaller specializations it remains important to have a strong general base to draw upon. In school I was surprised when I was able to draw connections between something I’d learned previously in one subject and was now learning about in a different subject. Most subjects do not exist in isolation, so the more you know, the more you can see these connections. For example, if studying literature, or even just in general reading for pleasure, you’re likely to come across references to history, philosophy and classic works of literature and without a broad base of general knowledge it is likely that these references will be missed or not understood. The more you know, the easier it becomes to learn, as you don’t have to spend as much time looking up references or things you don’t understand.

While both society and an individual stand to gain from the pursuit of a specialization, society by having someone with a particular set of knowledge or skills to fill what might have otherwise been a void and the individual being able to earn a higher income or achieve a higher status through the use of their particular skill set; it is more so the individual that stands to gain by expanding their general knowledge, rather than society, as there will always be a surplus of people with a general skill set and a need for people with specialized skills.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

News

For years I found myself gradually accumulating various websites that I would check daily to keep up with the “news” until I was spending hours a day reading. I eventually started to get tired of spending so much time on it, and trying to fit it in around all of the other stuff that I wanted to do as well. I’d finally managed to start narrowing down what I was reading, trying to only pick out things that looked important, but that didn’t really have as much of an effect as I’d hoped.

I read Eight Weeks to Optimum Health by Dr. Andrew Weil, during which it was recommended to try a news fast. At first the prospect of skipping the news for a day was worrisome, thinking about how much I would have to catch up on the next day. But as I started doing it each week, slowly increasing the number of days I “fasted” I began to look forward to the days when I didn’t read the news, as I could do other things I wanted to, without feeling like I was missing out on something, or being uninformed.

It was after weeks of news fasting that I finally started to gain control over my craving for news. As I’m looking at headlines now before I open something, I stop and ask myself if I really need or want to know anymore beyond what the headline already tells you, and most of the time, it turns out that it’s all I really need to know and I can move on.

I have also asked you to try a one-day news fast this week. I do not want you to become uninformed about the state of the world, but I note that paying attention to news commonly results in anxiety, rage, and other emotional states that probably impede the healing system. I have given you many suggestions about diet, about nourishing your body. I think it is useful to broaden our concept of nutrition to include what we put into our consciousness as well. Many people do not exercise much control over that and as a result take in a lot of mental junk food. My goal in asking you to practice news fasting throughout the Eight-Week Program is for you to discover that you have the power to decide how much of this material you want to let in. I have no objection to your turning on the news for information you really need; I worry about people who turn it on compulsively or unconsciously, who are addicted to the news and the emotional ups and downs it provides. Observe any difference you feel in your state of mind and body when you opt to ignore the news. Are you less anxious? Less stressed? Less angry? Less fearful? When you get to the end of the Eight-Week Program, I will ask you again, and at that time you can decide how much news you want to let back into your life.

After trying the fast I still wanted to allow some news into my life, but I found that by skipping the unimportant stuff, the filler stories and click-bait, I could still stay informed in much less time. More often than not, before, I’d click on a story because it sounded interesting and would have no actual affect on my life, I’d mostly forget what I’d even read about after a day or two, so why waste my time on it?

Ryan Holiday in his summary of what he learned over the course of another year had this to say about the news.

Stop following the news—or most of it. It doesn’t affect you that the CEO of Twitter stepped down or whatever is in the news right now. It’s so liberating to not have an opinion about these things. Or at least, to not be riled up about them.

The media has more time and space to fill than actual important, meaningful world events can possibly fill, so much of what gets passed off as news is of little actual value to anyone, beyond those reporting on it for the sake of having something to report. In Walden, Thoreau already recognized most news for what it really is, gossip, well before our 24 hour news networks and the Internet giving us constant access to the news.

And I am sure that I never read any memorable news in a newspaper. If we read of one man robbed, or murdered, or killed by accident, or one house burned, or one vessel wrecked, or one steamboat blown up, or one cow run over on the Western Railroad, or one mad dog killed, or one lot of grasshoppers in the winter–we never read of another. One is enough. If you are acquainted with the principle, what do you care for a myriad instances and applications? To a philosopher all news, as it is called, is gossip, and they who edit and read it are old women over their tea. Yet not a few are greedy after this gossip.

We now have entire publications and television programs dedicated to nothing but gossip, mostly about celebrities and people who become famous for no other reason than that they’re famous.

I’ve now managed to get my news reading under control, by taking the time to consider the potential value I can get out of something before reading it, and completely eliminating some sources that rarely published anything of substantiative value. What this means for me is that I now have more time to read articles with real informative content and books. I also find myself getting dragged down much less often now that I’m no longer reading about the worst things happening in the world each day, although of course bad news is impossible to avoid.

Now none of this is to suggest anyone should stay uninformed about world events, obviously there are some news stories that can’t, and shouldn’t, be ignored, it’s a responsible citizen’s duty to stay generally informed about the latest events in their country, and the world. But being more selective about what we choose to spend our time reading each day can leave us more time to do something with real value instead.

Leave a Comment

Filed under News

Procrastination

Recently I have been re-reading Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, which has gotten me thinking about quality, and how the unchecked pursuit of it can result inaction due to continuous procrastination, as the things we are working on never quite meet our standards. I’d first decided that I wanted to create a website years ago, I bought the domain, but months later, hadn’t done anything with it, as I hadn’t come up with just the right site. When I finally got around to doing something with the site, I spent weeks crafting it before I finally felt that it was good enough to publish. I intended to go back and add new pages later on, but never did. It just sat out there, stagnant, for years, until I finally resolved to start writing posts.

It was rather difficult publishing the first post, as I kept going over it, wondering if it was good enough. I finally decided that it was good enough, and if I did find something wrong with it, I could always go back and edit it, it didn’t have to be absolutely perfect the first time. The pursuit of perfection can be paralyzing, in the end, we just have to do the best we can and hope that it’s good enough.

The answer, of course, is no, you still haven’t got anything licked. You’ve got to live right too. It’s the way you live that predisposes you to avoid the traps and see the right facts. You want to know how to paint a perfect painting? It’s easy. Make yourself perfect and then just paint naturally. That’s the way all the experts do it. The making of a painting of the fixing of a motorcycle isn’t separate from the rest of your existence. If you’re a sloppy thinker the six days of the week you aren’t working on your machine, what trap avoidances, what gimmicks, can make you all of a sudden sharp on the seventh? It all goes together.
But if you’re a sloppy thinker six days a week and you really try to be sharp on the seventh, then maybe the next six days aren’t going to be quite as sloppy as the preceding six. What I’m trying to come up with on these gumption traps, I guess, is shortcuts to living right.
The real cycle you’re working on is a cycle called yourself. The machine that appears to be “out there” and the person that appears to be “in here” are not two separate thing. They grow toward Quality or fall away from Quality together.

Procrastination as the result of a concern that a work is not good enough or of a certain quality is really due to anxiety. Anxiety that we may have missed something and if we only go back over it one more time we’ll find something that we missed before and needs to be corrected. Eventually these corrections no longer add anything of value to the original work and become work for the sake of having something to do as an excuse to not complete what we originally set out to do.

After enough iterations through looking for things to change, when you can go through twice without finding anything to change, that’s probably when it’s time to say it’s good enough and it’s time to finish. Later, perhaps day, months or even years later going back over our work, we’ll likely find thing about it that we’d like to change, or wish we’d done differently, this is a good thing. It means we’ve either gotten better at our craft.

Anxiety, the next gumption trap, is sort of the opposite of ego. You’re so sure you’ll do everything wrong you’re afraid to do anything at all. Often this, rather than “laziness,” is the real reason you find it hard to get started. This gumption trap of anxiety, which results from overmotivation, can lead to all kinds of errors of excessive fussiness. You fix things that don’t need fixing, and chase after imaginary ailments.

I recently came across a work by the Roman Stoic philosopher Seneca, On the Shortness of Life, which serves as a wonderful reminder, that all we really have is time, and never know how much of it we actually have, so if we’re going to do something, we might as well start it now, because who knows if we’ll ever get the chance to finish it.

But putting things off is the biggest waste of life: it snatches away each day as it comes, and denies us the present by promising the future. The greatest obstacle to living is expectancy, which hangs upon tomorrow and loses today. You are arranging what lies in Fortune’s control, and abandoning what lies in yours. What are you looking at? To what goal are you straining? The whole future lies in uncertainty: live immediately.

You must set your hands to tasks which you can finish or at least hope to finish, and avoid those which get bigger as you proceed and do not cease where you had intended.

To help avoid procrastination, have a clear cut goal of what you must accomplish in order to consider a task to be done, before starting, then when you reach that goal, review your work and see if it meets your standards, is it good enough? The first time through, probably not, so go back over it, make changes, improve it and after a couple looks over, when you no longer see anything in need to improvement, consider it done.

The hardest part is really getting started, it’s best to start immediately, when an idea or inspiration hits you, to do something of value, before you let it sit and lose the initial motivation. Once the initial burst of inspiration dissipates, you’re much less likely to actually go back and complete the task you were inspired to do. Life’s too short to spend all of our time thinking about getting started on something and never getting around to actually doing it.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Procrastination

Fiction

Each year for the month of October I like to pick out a few horror, or in someway related to Halloween, books to read. This year one of the books I chose was, Something Wicked This Way Comes, by Ray Bradbury, a novel about two teenage boys who visit a dark carnival that comes to their hometown a week before Halloween. I’d decided to read it just looking for a good Halloween story, which it was, but more than that it turns out. There were some standout passages in which one of the boy’s fathers philosophizes about life and being a good person.

Sometimes the man who looks happiest in town, with the biggest smile, is the one carrying the biggest load of sin. There are smiles and smiles; learn to tell the dark variety from the light. The seal-barker, the laugh-shouter, half the time he’s covering up. He’s had his fun and he’s guilty. And men do love sin, Will, oh how they love it, never doubt, in all shapes, sizes, colors, and smells. Times come when troughs, not tables, suit our appetites. Hear a man too loudly praising others, and look to wonder if he didn’t just get up from the sty. On the other hand, that unhappy, pale, put-upon man walking by, who looks all guilt and sin, why, often that’s your good man with a capital G, Will. For being good is a fearful occupation; men strain at it and sometimes break in two. I’ve known a few. You work twice as hard to be a farmer as to be his hog. I suppose it’s thinking about trying to be good makes the crack run up the wall one night. A man with high standards, too, the least hair falls on him sometimes wilts his spine. He can’t let himself alone, won’t lift himself off the hook if he falls just a breath from grace.

Have I said anything I started out to say about being good? God, I don’t know. A stranger is shot in the street, you hardly move to help. But if, half an hour before, you spent just ten minutes with the fellow and knew a little about him and his family, you might just jump in front of his killer and try to stop it. Really knowing is good. Not knowing, or refusing to know, is bad, or amoral, at least. You can’t act if you don’t know. Acting without knowing take you right off the cliff.

Another book I read throughout October was The Stand, by Stephen King, about a super flu accidentally released which kills 99% of the population and an ensuing struggle to decide who will control and rebuild society. In addition to lessons about being a better person, there some interesting commentary on society as the characters were figuring out how to rebuild civilization and society after much of what we take for granted was damaged or destroyed.

Men who find themselves late are never sure. They are all the things the civics books tell us the good citizens should be: partisans but never zealots, respecters of the facts which attend each situation but never benders of those facts, uncomfortable in positions of leadership but rarely able to turn down a responsibility once it has been offered … or thrust upon them. They make the best leaders in a democracy because they are unlikely to fall in love with power. Quite the opposite.

Show me a man or a woman alone and I’ll show you a saint. Give me two and they’ll fall in love. Give me three and they’ll invent the charming thing we call ‘society’. Give me four and they’ll build a pyramid. Give me five and they’ll make one an outcast. Give me six and they’ll reinvent prejudice. Give me seven and in seven years they’ll reinvent warfare.

Many people read non-fiction because they want to read things that are true, but sometimes fiction can say true things much shorter and simpler than non-fiction. When reading fiction as you’re following along with the characters and sharing their experiences you can absorb ideas and feelings that may not necessarily being explicitly expressed in the words of the story, but are still conveyed through the character’s experiences and their reactions to them. While thinking about this I was reminded of a quote from V for Vendetta:

Artists use lies to tell the truth. Yes, I created a lie. But because you believed it, you found something true about yourself.

In addition to telling truths that may not otherwise be expressible, fiction can have it’s own lasting effects, just like non-fiction. Reading non-fiction can build up your knowledge and store of facts, reading fiction can build up your empathy, helping you relate to others better and easier as found in a study of the effects of reading various types of books. By spending time reading fiction and experiencing life through someone else’s perspective, we are better able to understand the perspectives of those around us in real life. Thereby hopefully causing us to treat others better or perhaps take a step back when someone doesn’t treat us so well and trying to see things from their perspective, hopefully seeing why they may have done what they did.

To maximize the benefits of reading it’s therefore important to read a variety of genres and include both fiction and non-fiction in your reading. If you only read fiction, try to find a non-fiction book about a topic you are interested in, perhaps something you’ve always wanted to know more about, a historical event, or even a person. If you only read non-fiction, try to mix in a fiction book every once in a while, see things from someone else’s perspective, and hopefully get lost in a good story. If you don’t read a all, start small, maybe a book a month, alternating fiction and non-fiction. And if you already read a variety of books, keep doing what you’re doing.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Reading

Meditation

A few years ago I found myself having a terrible day, I kept dwelling on the bad things that had happened until it got to the point where I just couldn’t take thinking about it any more. I’d recently read The Dharma Bums, which had given me my first real introduction to meditation, beyond typical stereotypes of monks in temples sitting on the ground and constantly saying ‘mmmmm’. I already knew by then that the general idea was to sit still, clear your mind of thoughts and just concentrate on your breath. So wanting to clear my mind, I decided to give it a try.

Every afternoon I went into the piney woods with my dogs, read, studied, meditated, in the warm winter southern sun, and came back and made supper for everybody at dusk.

I sat under the tree in the yard and looked up at the stars or closed my eyes to meditate and tried to quiet myself down back to my normal self.

The way it was described in the book made it sound so peaceful and relaxing that it helped me get past the stereotypes and think that it might be worth a shot. So when I finally found myself feeling like I just didn’t want to be thinking any more not too long after, I gave it a try.

I found that it helped, at least for a while, enough that the next day I decided to do another session. I have continued a daily practice since then. I was inspired to learn more about meditation and Buddhism in general, so I start reading up on them. One of the books I found most informative was Zen Mind, Beginner’s Mind. When I’d first started meditating I’d get frustrated with myself when I was unable to maintain my focus on my breathing and would get through my allotted meditation session time only to realize that I’d spent the entire session lost in though. After reading more about meditation, including Zen Mind, Beginner’s Mind, I’ve stopped being frustrated with myself for getting lost in thought, and now just hope to better maintain my focus during my next session.

I often find myself when my session time approaches thinking about other things I’d like to be doing at the time instead, then when I sit down to meditate find myself reminded why it is I do it as I relax and clear my mind, although I still struggle with thoughts popping into my head of things that I’d like to do after the session, I try to push them to the side and hopefully recall them later when I am done.

These forms are not the means of obtaining the right state of mind. To take this posture is itself to have the right state of mind. There is no need to obtain some special state of mind.

When we practice zazen our mind always follows our breathing. When we inhale, the air comes into the inner world. When we exhale, the air goes out to the outer world. The inner world is limitless, and the outer world is also limitless. We say “inner world” or “outer world,” but actually there is just one whole world. In this limitless world, our throat is like a swinging door. The air comes in and goes out like someone passing through a swinging door. If you think, “I breathe,” the “I” is extra. There is no you to say “I.” What we call “I” is just a swinging door which moves when we inhale and when we exhale. It just moves; that is all. When your mind is pure and calm enough to follow this movement, there is nothing: no “I,” no world, no mind nor body; just a swinging door.

I still find myself disappointed when I’m not able to maintain my focus for the entire session, but it doesn’t get to me like it used to, just taking the time to sit down and try is the only thing that you have absolute control over. Going just a day or two without sitting now makes sitting down to meditate, no matter what happens during the session, whether I am able to maintain my focus or find my mind wandering, is rewarding in itself.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Meditation

Language Learning

As part of my process of furthering my education I started trying to learn French again, after having taken it for years in school, and forgetting most of it. Many of us would like to learn another language, but either don’t know where to begin, or grow tired of the lessons and eventually give up. I was inspired after reading The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin, where he recommended starting with French as a foreign language to learn.

I had begun in 1733 to study languages; I soon made myself so much a master of the French as to be able to read the books with ease. I then undertook the Italian. An acquaintance, who was also learning it, us’d often to tempt me to play chess with him. Finding this took up too much of the time I had to spare for study, I at length refus’d to play any more, unless on this condition, that the victor in every game should have a right to impose a task, either in parts of the grammar to be got by heart, or in translations, etc., which tasks the vanquish’d was to perform upon honour, before our next meeting. As we play’d pretty equally, we thus beat one another into that language. I afterwards with a little painstaking, acquir’d as much of the Spanish as to read their books also.

I have already mention’d that I had only one year’s instruction in a Latin school, and that when very young, after which I neglected that language entirely. But, when I had attained an acquaintance with the French, Italian, and Spanish, I was surpris’d to find, on looking over a Latin Testament, that I understood so much more of that language than I had imagined, which encouraged me to apply myself again to the study of it, and I met with more success, as those preceding languages had greatly smooth’d my way.

From these circumstances, I have thought that there is some inconsistency in our common mode of teaching languages. We are told that it is proper to begin first with the Latin, and, having acquir’d that, it will be more easy to attain those modern languages which are deriv’d from it; and yet we do not begin with the Greek, in order more easily to acquire the Latin. It is true that, if you can clamber and get to the top of a staircase without using the steps, you will more easily gain them in descending; but certainly, if you begin with the lowest you will with more ease ascend to the top; and I would therefore offer it to the consideration of those who superintend the education of our youth, whether, since many of those who begin with the Latin quit the same after spending some years without having made any great proficiency, and what they have learnt becomes almost useless, so that their time has been lost, it would not have been better to have begun with the French, proceeding to the Italian, etc.; for, tho’, after spending the same time, they should quit the study of languages and never arrive at the Latin, they would, however, have acquired another tongue or two, that, being in modern use, might be serviceable to them in common life.

Many people take a foreign language as a class in school, and quickly forget most of what they learn. The key to learning a language is practice, if you don’t use it consistently, you’ll quickly get rusty and forget. With Duolingo, you can practice for just a few minutes a day and consistently build your vocabulary.

After I’d decided to work towards learning a foreign language, I started using Duolingo, which turns the process of learning a language into a kind of game, earning various points and levels, it helps encourage you to make progress. After a year of consistently using the site, I set a goal for myself to read The Little Prince, in French, something I was supposed to have done in school, but didn’t actually complete. I managed to do it, although with a lot of help from Google Translator.

My current goal is to finish the entire French tree on Duolingo this year, then look for other sources where I can continue practicing French. I’ll then probably move onto the Spanish language in Duolingo, while also trying to keep up my French practice there.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Languages

Reading Books

I was inspired to start writing this because I’ve had a large focus on reading for the past few years. Reading is great and all, it can entertain and inform, both in the form of fiction or non-fiction, but after a while, I had to ask myself, why was I doing all of this reading? The main reason being to pursue a course of life long learning; just because we are no longer in school, does not mean that we need to, or should, stop learning; so I took it upon myself to further my education.

Reading has the power to change your life, it’s just a matter of finding the right book or even just the right line in a book that really speaks to you, and gives you a new insight into a problem you have been facing, or the motivation to do something new or make a change to the way you are living your life. As Thoreau said in Walden:

It is not all books that are as dull as their readers.  There are probably words addressed to our condition exactly, which, if we could really hear and understand, would be more salutary than the morning or the spring to our lives, and possibly put a new aspect on the face of things for us.  How many a man has dated a new era in his life from the reading of a book!  The book exists for us, perchance, which will explain our miracles and reveal new ones.  The at present unutterable things we may find somewhere uttered.  These same questions that disturb and puzzle and confound us have in their turn occurred to all the wise men; not one has been omitted; and each has answered them, according to his ability, by his words and his life.

If you study reading as an activity, there are multiple levels at which one can read something at according to the classic, How to Read a Book:

  1. Elementary – Simply being able to understand the words that are on the page
  2. Inspectional – Pretty much skimming, just trying to get a basic idea of what it is about
  3. Analytical – A more active style of reading, taking notes and looking up words and references you don’t understand
  4. Syntopical – Combining a variety of sources and comparing and contrasting their various arguments to have a deep understanding of a particular topic

For most of the reading I’ve done outside of school I was stuck on the border between inspectional and analytical. I’d read every word, so not just skimming, but I wouldn’t bother to look up words I did not know, and assumed that for the most part I’d forget most of what I read, so I just hoped maybe something would stick. Eventually I realized that while there were worse things I could have been doing, for the most part, I was still wasting my time, by not making an effort to engage in, or even properly understand a book, I was merely passively consuming something that could be of a greater value to me. I could have gotten about the same from watching TV as I was getting out of the books I was reading.

So, in the past year I’ve started making a point to highlight and take note of any passages I find interesting and save them into Evernote while also looking up words and references I don’t know. I was inspired to do this thanks to an article I read by Ryan Holiday, about keeping a common place book, a collection of all of the things you come across and find noteworthy or would like to be able to quickly recall later. While admittedly he does say to actually write things down instead of using Evernote, I will type out any notes I take from a book, hoping that going over the text again, carefully, might cause it to stick in my memory better.

Now that I’ve started to build up this collection of notes I’m hoping to use it to start to push towards producing a synthesis of what I’ve read and hopefully in the process try to spread some of the ideas that have caught my attention or been spawned from something I have read. I want all of the reading that I’m doing to build towards something, beyond just keeping me entertained; what that something is, I’m not really sure yet, but I’m hoping this is a start.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Reading